Labyrith of Plastic Waste
Analyzing literature in
an ecocritical way makes one rethink its perspective on the nature. But what
does other mediums of art do to raise conversation about global warming and
climate change and environmental pollution? In this blog entry, I’d like to
focus the attention on environmental art.
Environmental art is a
very broad term that includes a number of different practices and movement.
Land art, Earth art, Sustainable art, Conceptual art – these are just a few examples
of environmental art. Hence, technique, media and style varies as well. As a
movement, environmental art emerged in the 1960s, when famous individuals such
as Nils Udo, Jean-Max Albert and Piotr Kowalski paved the way for this form of
art. They have been continuously creating environment-related work since then. Environmental
art deals with exploring the relationship between mankind world and natural
environment, it challenges our relationship with nature and remediates damaged
environments.
The current environmental issues demand some innovation on the part of artists to provide new ways to
not only challenge us, but also themselves when creating art. This is where
Luzinterruptus come into play.
Photos by Gustavo Sanabria

The idea behind the installation was to
graphically visualize the amount of plastic humans consume in their daily lives
and don’t often recycle. As a consequence, the plastic that is dumped in
nature, ends up floating in the ocean and destroying the marine ecosystem. Furthermore,
in these installation Luzinterruptus
also brought to attention the fact that the uncontrolled usage of bottled
liquids is causing great problems not just to nature but to poor countries as
well, since their reservoirs are
being privatized and bought by large corporations, thus owning
water. Luzinterruptus argue that water
is a fundamental right of all Earth’s inhabitants and privatization
shouldn’t take that right away from them.
Photos
by Lola Martínez
Such
collaboration allowed Luzinterruptus to analyze the usage of bottled drinks in order to show which were the most
popular beverage brands, that were damaging the environment most. As the group
notes, most of the bottles were of mineral water as well as of soda. It also
made them highlight which cities had official recycling services or recycling
centers and containers that actually worked. In Madrid, for example, they found
out that PET (thermoplastic polymer resin) isn’t recycled separately and is mixed with all kinds of
containers. Hence, that’s why they asked around hospitals and institutions
since the city’s official recycling centre couldn’t provide bottles.
Thus, in addition to highlighting the
daily usage of plastic bottles and its harm with their installation, the art
group also exposed the trash collections business, the challenges of recycling and
the need for constant improvement.
It should also be noted that after each
exhibition was closed, the piece was disassembled and every part of the
exhibition was recycled. Thus, the installation itself didn’t do any harm to
the environment.
The goal of this post was to showcase
how artists try to bring forth environmental issues without actually damaging
the nature. If they can do it, why can’t we in our daily lives try to be less
destructive towards nature? It can start with a simple reusable water bottle
instead of a plastic one. Change comes with small steps. The sooner we’ll
realize that, the better.
Mariam Meparishvili
Would be nice to see something similar in Tallinn!
ReplyDelete